Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the limit-login-attempts-reloaded domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home1/enabling/public_html/blog/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Deprecated: Hook site-logo is deprecated since version 13.4! Use custom-logo instead. Jetpack no longer supports site-logo feature. Add custom-logo support to your theme instead: https://developer.wordpress.org/themes/functionality/custom-logo/ in /home1/enabling/public_html/blog/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home1/enabling/public_html/blog/wp-includes/functions.php:6121) in /home1/enabling/public_html/blog/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Deutsche Bank's dunderheaded climate change message https://www.enablingchange.com.au/blog/climate-change/200907deutsche-bank-dunderheaded-climate_2528-html/ Treats for changemakers, from Les Robinson. Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:53:36 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2 By: Sean Kidney https://www.enablingchange.com.au/blog/climate-change/200907deutsche-bank-dunderheaded-climate_2528-html/#comment-2 Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:53:36 +0000 http://enablingchange.posterous.com/2009/07/deutsche-bank-dunderheaded-climate_2528.html#comment-2 While I am thrilled and keen that there are any sort of indicators at all beginning to appear, I do agree that a there could be much better ones that this. However, I’m not sure that positive indicators are what are needed at the moment: would govts have realised that reducing ozone-destroying chemicals was important if the indicator used was the reduction of ozone chemicals in use? No, it was the community threat from being told on the weather each night what the UV index was at any one time that had more impact. Maybe we just need "years to go to get emissions going down so as to avoid the collapse of civilization"? Acording to IPCC Chair Ravi Pachauri it’s five. Yes, FIVE.

]]>